Other recent blogs
To stay competitive in tomorrow’s digitally-driven ecosystem, agile and scalable software applications are a go-to strategy for many companies. This is because the wave of rapid digital transformation has necessitated improved business responsiveness with rapidly changing software engineering dynamics and customer demands.
Today when the business landscape is pushing new-age companies to create more transformational user experiences to drive greater competitive agility and foster continuous innovation. Software development exactly promises the same on the grounds of software development effectiveness.
No wonder the global IT investments on software development is growing exponentially. The journey of software application transformation, when executed under certain software development metrics and KPIs, help companies solve these frictions in a developer’s experience.
Different types of friction in the software development lifecycle
Neglection of these frictions often jeopardizes the entire software development effectiveness and adds an unwanted cognitive load on software development team with increased complexities. This can lead to failure in software transformation because of uninformed decisions, poor performance, vague estimates, technical debts, etc.
The race to software development efficiency
Software development metrics and KPIs are prominent in ruling out the possibility of unexpected failures and unlock breakthrough software efficiency. How? They bridge the gap between software engineering and the business on the grounds of speed, cycle, and response time. Using these evaluation metrics, SDLC team can solve complexity of managing innovation, engineering, and management. This result in continuous performance monitoring against critical business objectives. For example - the reduction of technical debt by 50 percent.
However, many companies get confused between KPIs and metrics without realizing they are different. Let’s understand the thin-line difference between metrics and KPIs:
software development metrics vs KPIs
Where do software development metrics and KPIs matter?
SDLC is a huge and complex journey involving many people at different stages - technical officers, project managers, user experience designers, app developers, coding programmers, quality assurance, and technical support. Each stakeholder has their own role in the final software delivery excellence. Software development metrics and KPIs work as a roadmap for the entire team, guiding on what milestones to track, including Lines of Code (LoC), Instruction Path Length (IPL), and code complexity.
Metrics and KPIs gauge product quality quotient by quickly assessing individualistic progress and comparing progress and performance between SDLC stakeholders. Here are the top reasons why they matter the most:
- Performance evaluation: Metrics and KPIs in SDLC streamline the performance evaluation process within an organization. When set by default within an SDLC, they help stakeholders and the development team analyze the workflow dynamics and provide valuable insights into the progress of the entire process.
- Strategic alignment with organizational goals: KPIs and metrics promise greater excellence by helping the SDLC team understand important data points. Each metric primarily focuses on a specific goal. For example: improvements in the number of bugs reported, stabilizing workflows, prioritizing test-driven development (TDD) or continuous delivery.
- Quality assurance: The impact of rigorous testing and quality assurance holds major significance in minimizing development time and operational costs. Rooted in software effectiveness, KPIs and metrics streamline the journey of measuring, tracking, and benchmarking the performance of line-of-code quality.
In software engineering, software development metrics and KPIs are a company-wide endeavor where everybody is involved in reducing friction in SDLC performance. Here, every aspect needs to take a systematic approach rooted in different metrics and KPIs. Evaluating the software development effectiveness using the right approach quickly improves speed, scalability, and usability. This blog will explore the most relevant software development metrics every SDLC team must consider.
Top software development metrics to follow in 2024
- Code metrics: Depending on where you stand in your own software development process, you can seamlessly evaluate the software's structural aspects using the formal code metrics. Going by code metrics simply means breaking traditional silos and working proactively on Lines of Code (LOC) to measure code size. With these metrics, you can assess the cyclomatic complexities through early problem detection across instruction path length, number of times errors triggered in code, and program complexity along with LOC. This results in improved maintainability and readability throughout the development process.
- Quality metrics: Quality in software engineering is the most important aspect. Quality metrics help most SDLC teams to put quality measurement first. The rigorous evaluation starts by identifying code line number, software complexity, interfaces and classes, functions, and rate of bug generation. These metrics also bridge the time gap between failure and repair by detecting bugs and errors per 1000 lines of code - both emerging and existing. As a result, there is a reduction in app crash rate, and significant improvements in readability, code clarity, and code efficiency are the core benefits of quality metrics.
- Code review metrics: Software development has a high tendency to last-minute code errors, technical debts, and cyclomatic complexity. Code review metrics act as a performance indicator to strengthen quality control postures. They quickly analyze how much time each developer invested in reviewing lines of code. Also, these metrics capture the number of defects identified in the review session and the percentage of code reviewed by each SDLC team member separately during the review process. This leads to significant improvements in code reliability, code coverage, and reduction in bugs.
- Operational metrics: Time-to-speed has become the new priority for businesses in the fast-paced SDLC. These metrics are integral in identifying random defects, reducing obtuse errors, and addressing poor user experience. Tracking operational performance from these metrics focuses solely on Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), which stands for unexpected outages and repairable software failures. Second in the process comes Mean Time to Recover (MTTR). Operational metrics enable the SDLC team to measure the time required to troubleshoot and repair accidental breakdowns in software components.
- Usability metrics: It is crucial to evaluate the UX/UI of software, websites, and applications to quantify enhanced user experience. The usability metrics help the SDLC team to deliver a product that is neither under nor over-engineered. These metrics primarily rest on software effectiveness, code accuracy, simplicity, time-based efficiency, number of interdependencies, and user satisfaction. As the name implies, the aim of these metrics is to solve challenges related to slow loading speed, unintended actions, and unclear error messages while preventing repeated mistakes and monitor progress over time.
Streamline your journey to software development effectiveness with Kellton
Take your first step forward towards software development effectiveness with kellton and make informed business decisions with faster speed-to-delivery. Our skilled product engineering team at Kellton is committed to deliver maximum business value. We position the most relevant software development metrics and KPIs at the right place within the SDLC to identify problem areas quickly. Also, we help businesses to evaluate their project's performance and improve software quality posture by assessing critical data captured and trim down on wasted efforts throughout the journey.